NSFAS Board Launches Investigation into CEO Andile Nongogo and Reviews Procurement Systems. In a significant development that underscores the commitment to transparency and accountability, the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) Board has taken the decisive step of commencing an investigation into its CEO, Andile Nongogo. Simultaneously, the board is conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement systems and processes, addressing critical concerns within the organization.
Investigation Focus: Unpacking the Direct Payment Project
At the center of this investigation lies the Direct Payment Project, a crucial initiative aimed at facilitating the disbursement of student allowances. Introduced as a pilot project last year for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges, the project’s full implementation for university students began this year. This initiative has been met with mixed reactions, prompting the need for a thorough examination of its execution, outcomes, and implications.
Leadership in the Pursuit of Transparency
The NSFAS Board has engaged the services of Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi and Sandile July to lead the investigation. The selection of accomplished legal professionals ensures an impartial and thorough assessment of the situation, instilling confidence in the process and outcomes.
CEO’s Leave of Absence and Interim Leadership
During the duration of the investigation, Andile Nongogo has taken a leave of absence from his role as CEO. To ensure the smooth functioning of the organization during this period, Masile Ramorwesi, the chief financial officer, has assumed the role of acting CEO.
Reaffirming Commitment to Governance
Ernest Khosa, chairperson of the NSFAS Board, has reiterated the board’s unwavering commitment to upholding principles of clean governance. This pledge serves as a cornerstone of the organization’s efforts to restore trust and confidence among stakeholders.
Ministerial Directive and Student Outcry
Minister Blade Nzimande’s directive, urging the NSFAS board to address challenges linked to the direct payment solution, has brought attention to the urgency of rectifying the situation. This directive followed closely on the heels of the investigation announcement and widespread student protests triggered by concerns within the NSFAS framework.
Students Speak Up: Memorandum of Demands
In a display of collective action, students from various universities took to the streets to voice their dissatisfaction with the implementation of the direct payment system through third-party companies. The culmination of their efforts resulted in the submission of a memorandum of demands to the National Assembly committee on higher education and the Department of Higher Education.
These demands encompass a diverse range of concerns, including calls for enhanced consultations with Student Representative Councils (SRC), initiation of a Special Investigative Unit (SIU) probe, decentralization of NSFAS for agile solutions, prompt review of student defunding, elimination of the NSFAS accommodation cap, empowerment of the Missing Middle, rejection of the 60-credit policy, uniformity in NSFAS funding criteria, and refusal of the NSFAS Direct Payment mandate.
Prior Scrutiny by Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa)
A previous investigation conducted by the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) raised red flags regarding the mismanagement of student funds and potential tender corruption within NSFAS. The investigation revealed that entities lacking appropriate licenses were entrusted with the task of managing direct payments of student allowances. Consequently, students incurred higher fees, and many were left financially strained and uncertain about their basic necessities.
Prolonged Struggles and Presidential Intervention
The challenges within NSFAS have persisted over time, necessitating intervention at the highest level. In a move to address corruption and maladministration, President Cyril Ramaphosa authorized the Special Investigative Unit (SIU) to delve into allegations and recover financial losses incurred due to corrupt practices and negligence.
Conclusion
The NSFAS Board’s proactive stance in investigating CEO Andile Nongogo and reviewing procurement systems speaks to its dedication to responsible governance. The examination of the Direct Payment Project’s execution reflects the organization’s commitment to learning from its experiences and addressing concerns head-on. As the investigation unfolds and student concerns are addressed, the NSFAS aims to emerge stronger, fostering trust and collaboration among stakeholders while working towards its mission of ensuring equitable access to higher education.
