NGO Coalition Calls SASSA SRD Increase An Insult

Questionable Timing and Motives

The timing and rationale behind the modest R20 increment to the SASSA SRD grants have raised eyebrows, particularly in light of the upcoming 2024 General Elections. The Bureau for Economic Research (BER) has voiced skepticism regarding the timing of this announcement, suggesting that it should have been made during February’s budget speech for greater clarity and transparency.

Inadequate Adjustment For Inflation

The decision to increase the SASSA SRD grants by a mere R20 has sparked debate, with critics arguing that it fails to address the pressing issue of inflation.

Had the adjustment been intended to keep pace with rising living costs, experts suggest that a far more substantial increase, around R80 per person per month, would have been warranted. Despite the seemingly modest increment, reports indicate that the financial burden on the country is significant, estimated at approximately R2.2 billion for the current financial year alone.

Contradictory Spending Patterns

Interestingly, while the government appears to be tightening its belt on social welfare spending, allocating a reduced budget of R33.6 billion for the following year compared to R36 billion this year, other financial commitments, notably debt repayments, continue to consume a considerable portion of the national budget.

This discrepancy raises concerns about the government’s priorities and its commitment to addressing the needs of its most vulnerable citizens.

Broken Promises And Political Opportunism

The decision to implement a nominal increase in SASSA SRD grants also calls into question President Ramaphosa’s pledge to introduce an “expanded and enhanced” basic income grant. Critics argue that this promise remains unfulfilled, with the meager R20 increment falling far short of providing meaningful relief to those in need.

The Universal Basic Income Coalition, comprising various stakeholders, condemns the decision as a cynical ploy ahead of the elections, emphasizing the persistent food insecurity faced by millions of South Africans.

Systemic Exclusions And Insufficient Coverage

Despite the evident need, the number of Social Relief of Distress grants disbursed monthly remains significantly lower than the number of eligible applicants, indicating potential systemic exclusions.

The coalition alleges deliberate measures to limit the number of disbursements, further exacerbating the financial strain on vulnerable communities. Additionally, the coalition highlights that the incremental increase fails to adequately address the escalating cost of living, leaving beneficiaries struggling to meet even the most basic nutritional requirements.

Conclusion

The decision to implement a nominal increase in SASSA SRD grants has been met with widespread condemnation, with critics denouncing it as insufficient and out of touch with the harsh realities faced by millions of South Africans. As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether the government will heed the calls for more meaningful support for its most vulnerable citizens.